The iconic image of
American photographer Lee Miller in Adolf Hitler's bathtub in Munich. The image
was taken on April 30, 1945, the day Hitler committed suicide in Berlin.


This decline is
usually attributed to her suffering undiagnosed post-traumatic stress disorder,
and the horrors she witnessed in the war were certainly enough to haunt anyone.
Only hours before that iconic image in Hitler’s bathroom was taken by her
wartime lover David Scherman, a photographer for Life magazine, she had worn
the heavy army boots pictured next to the bath while capturing the horrors at
Dachau.But it’s another photograph of Miller, again sitting naked in a bathtub,
that may help explain her desolation in later life. This image was
captured in 1930, when she was 23, and the man behind the lens — as he was for
numerous other nude studies of her over the years — was her father, Theodore
Miller. Described by one colleague as ‘an American free spirit wrapped in the
body of a Greek goddess’, the legendary beauty once had the mould for a new
design of champagne glass taken from her breast; she seduced dozens of men,
including Charlie Chaplin and Pablo Picasso — but she was no dumb blonde.
Miller
wearing a Chanel outfit for a modelling assignment, circa Circa July 1928 That
summer, Picasso painted six portraits of Lee, including one in which she had a
third eye, positioned between her legs, an anatomical inaccuracy that belied
their intimacy that summer. She later discovered that Roland had bought one of
the portraits and was displaying it proudly on his mantelpiece in North London.
When she finally left her Egyptian husband and moved in with Penrose months
before the war began, it was clear she was keener than ever to put her days as
a sex object firmly behind her. As images of her steal the show at
the National Portrait Gallery’s new exhibition devoted to Man Ray — the
Surrealist photographer and artist whose lover and muse she was for three years
— her son, Antony Penrose, has announced the discovery of thousands of her
hitherto unseen negatives at the family farmhouse in Sussex where — as Lady
Penrose — she lived until her death from cancer in 1977. Available online
from the end of next month, and including shots of the liberation of Paris in
1944, they will give fascinating new insights into her career. But they are
unlikely to explain one of the great mysteries of her life.


The pictures of her
in Hitler’s bathroom might suggest otherwise but they are part of a series in
which she and David Scherman took turns to be photographed in the tub and,
armed with the somewhat unlikely accreditation of ‘war correspondent for
Vogue’,
she was always determined to compete on equal terms with men. This
sometimes led her into trouble. Shortly after D-Day, she broke a rule
against female correspondents going anywhere near the frontline, and followed
Allied soldiers as they made their final assault on the Germans in the French
town of St Malo.For this, she was briefly arrested by the U.S. Army but,
despite such experiences, the war seems
to have found her at her most fulfilled.Civilian photography could never have
the same appeal. In 1949, when she and Roland moved to a farm house in Sussex,
following their marriage two years earlier, Lee Miller put her photos in the
attic and hardly ever talked about the war. Nonetheless, it’s likely she
missed not just the adrenaline and the camaraderie but, perhaps most important,
the respect of soldiers and male colleagues. Lee Miller (right) with art critic
Frederick Laws (left) at a theatre performance in 1950. In her later years
Miller suffered from depression.To the casual
observer, indeed, they seem more like portraits of a young woman and her far
older lover than of father and daughter.What point Man Ray was trying to make
with the pictures is open to question, but Theodore’s naked photo
sessions with Lee are certainly all the more disturbing for the circumstances
in which they began.

When Antony Penrose
began writing a biography of his mother after her death, he discovered a secret
that she had taken to her grave. To appreciate the importance of this, we have
to remember that, as a little girl, she had learned to gain her father’s love
and approval by removing her clothes for him.
At war, perhaps for the first
time in her life, she was being appreciated not for what she looked like but
what she could do. Adjusting to civilian life must have been a challenge indeed
for the woman who always vowed she would ‘rather take a picture than be one’. Their
closeness is illustrated in the new exhibition of work by Man Ray. The artist
himself became so besotted with Miller that he insisted they be linked by a
golden chain when they were out together — but he could not hope to compete
with her father’s place in her affections.Father and daughter’s unsettling bond
became clear when Theodore visited Lee and Man Ray in Paris in December 1930.During
this time, according to Carolyn Burke, author of Lee Miller: A Life, ‘Theodore
relished the opportunity to do as many nude studies as he could schedule’. These
included shots of his daughter cavorting naked on her bed with stunning young
female models hired specially for the occasion. Burke describes one
photograph Theodore took of her with a woman called Tytia as stopping ‘just
short of lesbian sex’.

An engineer by
training, he was the manager of a large factory in the upstate New York town
of Poughkeepsie and was said to have taken advantage of his position by
fondling his female employees. Carolyn Burke suggests that he also had more
substantial liaisons with other women and, when he did show an interest in his
wife, it was to demand that she should pose naked for him in the name of art. It
was shortly after his daughter’s rape that Theodore, then 43, began taking nude
photographs of her, too. The first, posed two weeks short of her eighth
birthday in April 1915, shows her standing in the snow outside their house,
naked except for her slippers.

That this sudden interest in his daughter’s naked form should coincide with the attack on her naturally leads to suspicion, but Antony Penrose says he has found no evidence to suggest that Theodore was her rapist, or that there was any kind of incestuous relationship between them. Her brothers, Erik and John, revealed that in 1914, when Lee was seven, she was sent to stay with family friends near New York while her mother, Florence, was ill in hospital. While there, she was raped and infected with gonorrhoea — apparently by a male friend or relative of the family she was staying with. Mysteriously, no action was taken against the perpetrator, presumably for fear of an ensuing scandal. This is perhaps understandable, but much harder to comprehend is her father’s behaviour at this time. ‘The way he photographed her was clearly a transgression of the usual parent-child boundaries,’ he says. ‘But although it wasn’t normal, I don’t think it was harmful.’ He suggests instead that these naked photographs were Theodore’s attempt to restore his daughter’s self-esteem. ‘I believe that it was his way of saying: “We know you have this horrible disease but you are still a beautiful and clean person”. ’If so, it’s difficult to see why her father’s photographic ‘therapy’ should have extended to persuading several of her school-friends to strip for his camera, too. And despite the unbroken bond with Theodore, Lee later seems to have been uncomfortable about these shoots, particularly as she grew into an astoundingly beautiful woman.

That this sudden interest in his daughter’s naked form should coincide with the attack on her naturally leads to suspicion, but Antony Penrose says he has found no evidence to suggest that Theodore was her rapist, or that there was any kind of incestuous relationship between them. Her brothers, Erik and John, revealed that in 1914, when Lee was seven, she was sent to stay with family friends near New York while her mother, Florence, was ill in hospital. While there, she was raped and infected with gonorrhoea — apparently by a male friend or relative of the family she was staying with. Mysteriously, no action was taken against the perpetrator, presumably for fear of an ensuing scandal. This is perhaps understandable, but much harder to comprehend is her father’s behaviour at this time. ‘The way he photographed her was clearly a transgression of the usual parent-child boundaries,’ he says. ‘But although it wasn’t normal, I don’t think it was harmful.’ He suggests instead that these naked photographs were Theodore’s attempt to restore his daughter’s self-esteem. ‘I believe that it was his way of saying: “We know you have this horrible disease but you are still a beautiful and clean person”. ’If so, it’s difficult to see why her father’s photographic ‘therapy’ should have extended to persuading several of her school-friends to strip for his camera, too. And despite the unbroken bond with Theodore, Lee later seems to have been uncomfortable about these shoots, particularly as she grew into an astoundingly beautiful woman.
Once, when she was
19, Theodore took her to some secluded countryside outside Poughkeepsie to pose
as a woodland nymph.This was at around the time that Lee, who could never bring
herself to discuss the rape with anyone, tried to confide the obliquest of
references to it in her journal. This left her in tears and feeling ‘the
nearest to suicide I have ever been’, and her turmoil is perhaps reflected in
those pastoral photographs.

Neither can his
enthusiasm for joining in the photographic sessions with her father on that
visit to Paris in 1930 — sessions in which the two men photographed Lee
reclining nude on a bed with three other naked women.

All the while, however, Lee was getting an invaluable training in photography from Man Ray. When she left him in 1932 and returned to New York, where she pursued an affair with Aziz Eloui Bey, an Egyptian aristocrat 16 years older than her, she became a sought-after portrait photographer.Even so, it would take another ten years, and the outbreak of war, before she really found her forte. By then she had married and then left Eloui Bey (though they did not divorce until 1947) and begun sleeping with wealthy English artist Roland Penrose who, unusually, was only seven years older than her. When they first paired up on holiday in France in the summer of 1937, he introduced her to Pablo Picasso and informed the great artist that he was free to share the favours of his new paramour, an offer that 57-year-old Picasso took up enthusiastically.

All the while, however, Lee was getting an invaluable training in photography from Man Ray. When she left him in 1932 and returned to New York, where she pursued an affair with Aziz Eloui Bey, an Egyptian aristocrat 16 years older than her, she became a sought-after portrait photographer.Even so, it would take another ten years, and the outbreak of war, before she really found her forte. By then she had married and then left Eloui Bey (though they did not divorce until 1947) and begun sleeping with wealthy English artist Roland Penrose who, unusually, was only seven years older than her. When they first paired up on holiday in France in the summer of 1937, he introduced her to Pablo Picasso and informed the great artist that he was free to share the favours of his new paramour, an offer that 57-year-old Picasso took up enthusiastically.
No comments:
Post a Comment